A Note Regarding John Edwards

It took a couple years, but Edwards finally owned up to the truth that he cheated on his wife and fathered a child with his mistress. The only thing I want to point out is that the National Enquirer broke this story, and when they did a lot of the reaction was, “You’re going to believe a story from the National Enquirer?!! You can’t be serious!”

Well, yes, I am. The Enquirer also broke the Gary Hart story in 1987. And if not for them, we might never have found out about Edwards. Do you think CNN or the New York Times was going to stake out his hotel and chase him down the hall like the Enquirer did? They did the hard and dirty work that our prestigious outlets can’t stoop to in the case of a leading Democratic figure. I am thankful that the Enquirer is out there.

I’d also add that if anyone wants to know why no one trusts (or should trust) elected officials of either party, this is a great example. Yet another bald-faced liar who lies on TV interviews, in indignant press releases, and so on until the week before a book comes out nailing him to the wall. Just like Bill Clinton, just like Gary Hart, just like many others. Not only do they cheat on their spouses (Republicans too), but they lie and lie and lie until FORCED to tell the truth. So is there any reason to think they aren’t lying about all kinds of other things where they will never be forced to tell the truth? The presumption is that the always lie, unless forced to tell the truth.

6 thoughts on “A Note Regarding John Edwards”

  1. “There is no distinctly native American criminal class except Congress.”

    “We have the best congress money can buy.”

    “Reader, suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself.”

    -Mark Twain

  2. I looked at your blog today thinking “I bet he’ll have something to say about his “favorite” politician. You didn’t disappoint me! I couldn’t help but wonder yesterday why his story was all over the news. Really, this is something everyone already knew, and he’s gone from the scene so, I say, just let him be gone.

    And I TRULY hate to say this, but I took one look at Scott Brown Tuesday night and said “How long do you think it will be until we find out he cheats on his wife?” I hope I’m wrong.

    1. I agree about Scott Brown. The surprise will be if he ISN’T cheating on his wife. I think that has to be the default position in regard to politicians now: guilty until proven innocent. I feel like Mitt Romney is probably a safe bet, but that’s about it. The President does seem to be a good example in this regard, but who knows?

Leave a Reply to joelmartin Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.